<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WDMA Offers Insight into New Programs and Increased Legislative Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/wdma-offers-insight-into-new-programs-and-increased-legislative-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/wdma-offers-insight-into-new-programs-and-increased-legislative-focus/</link>
	<description>Door and Window Manufacturer/Shelter Trade Publication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger LeBrun</title>
		<link>http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/wdma-offers-insight-into-new-programs-and-increased-legislative-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger LeBrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwmmag.com/?p=1712#comment-431</guid>
		<description>I am disappointed that WDMA continues to leave out any mention of its skylight member concerns in this new initiative.  Although the organization&#039;s name is abbreviated to exclude this product category, they gladly accept our dues and fees.  My concern is that the unique aspects of roof-mounted fenestration products are being officially relegated to afterthoughts, particularly in regard to the 0.30/0.30 issue.  This needs to change, the sooner the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disappointed that WDMA continues to leave out any mention of its skylight member concerns in this new initiative.  Although the organization&#8217;s name is abbreviated to exclude this product category, they gladly accept our dues and fees.  My concern is that the unique aspects of roof-mounted fenestration products are being officially relegated to afterthoughts, particularly in regard to the 0.30/0.30 issue.  This needs to change, the sooner the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

