<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaFrance Urges Industry to Move Beyond Double-Pane Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/lafrance-urges-industry-to-support-highly-insulating-windows-and-move-beyond-double-pane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/lafrance-urges-industry-to-support-highly-insulating-windows-and-move-beyond-double-pane/</link>
	<description>Door and Window Manufacturer/Shelter Trade Publication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy LaMotte</title>
		<link>http://www.dwmmag.com/index.php/lafrance-urges-industry-to-support-highly-insulating-windows-and-move-beyond-double-pane/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy LaMotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwmmag.com/?p=1373#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Right on!  If we can produce R10 windows then we should legislate that the minimum would be an R8 for two years and then require windows to be an R9 and R10 in year 4.  By that time, we may be able to product R12 windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on!  If we can produce R10 windows then we should legislate that the minimum would be an R8 for two years and then require windows to be an R9 and R10 in year 4.  By that time, we may be able to product R12 windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

