Industry Responds to New LEED Draft; Wood Certification and PVC Issues Elicit FeedbackMarch 13th, 2012 | Category: Industry News
The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has released its latest draft of its LEED Rating System and a few points are drawing criticism from some in the industry.
First, in the section, Responsible Sourcing of Raw Material, new wood products must be certified by Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) “or better.”
Organizations, including the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI), have long tried to convince the USGBC to recognize other certification programs.
“This new language raises more issues than it resolves,” says Kathy Abusow, president and CEO of SFI. “Who will decide what is ‘better than FSC’ and on what basis?”
She adds that currently LEED only recognizes forests certified to the FSC, which account for about one quarter of North America’s certified forests. The rest are certified to three independent standards in use across North America – SFI, Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and American Tree Farm System (ATFS), all of which are endorsed by the international Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC).
“SFI is a strong advocate for green building and for all credible forest certification,” says Abusow. “With 90 percent of the world’s forests not certified to any standard, it’s time to break down LEED’s artificial barriers and raise understanding of forest certification and the important role it can play in green building.”
There is also a new section in the latest draft labeled, “Additional Chemical Avoidance” and one of the products on that list is PVC.
This was a topic of discussion among some attendees at the meeting of the Window and Door Manufacturers Association (WDMA) who met last week in Washington, D.C.
“There seems to be a welling up of concern over PVC again,” said Ric Jackson, director of external affairs, Quanex Building Products.
Allen Blakey, vice president of Industry and Government Affairs for the Vinyl Institute, says his organization is astonished to see PVC added to the USGBC’s list of chemicals to avoid. According to Blakey, PVC is a material that’s been studied for some time by the USGBC itself.
Blakey notes that the “USGBC has failed to live up to its claim of ‘technical rigor’ in LEED credits as well as its own procedures for balance, fairness and ‘consensus.’ It has ignored scientific studies (including its own TSAC review), as well as studies for the European Commission and others, that found PVC’s life-cycle health and environmental performance as good as, or better than, the performance of competing materials.”
He adds, “We are very disappointed that the USGBC has made this move; they’ve turned their backs on their own their own studies.”
Comments are due March 20, and USGBC members will then vote on the final draft.